Handy! |
So, three weeks later (to the day), and not a
single entry. Tragic, and no mistake. Part of
the problem is that I have been happy. There is
nothing like happiness to make you live and stay
in the moment without feeling driven to the page
for an hour or two to ruminate moodily on your
situation. Aside: I was listening to NPR
tonight, and suddenly I got really worried about
the upcoming war on Iraq. The media is
polarizing like crazy. Even good old national
public radio was sounding anti-government and
reactionary, suspicious and cynical. I dunno.
When everyone runs for the edge of the spectrum
and there is no work to negotiate the middle
space, that is when I start to get worried that
things might not end well. Then there was the
no/limited candy thing. In my life, not on NPR.
Outside of saving thousands of calories a week
from needless slaughter, there does not seem to
be much effect. If anything, being off candy
was/is worse than being on. I was tired, I went
through what must have been a mini-caffeine or
sugar withdrawal and was a bit sickish for a
week, and dig this: I had the biggest outbreak
of acne I have ever experienced since I was a
teen. What is up with that? I had a zit on my
chin that was so big I will have to claim it as
a dependent on my income taxes this year. Horrid
blemish outbreaks notwithstanding, I have
generally been pretty darned good these last
weeks. I have not spent a single cent of my own
money on candy. There have been a couple of
times where people offered me a piece of candy,
and to be social, I accepted. And when given a
bag of peanut M&Ms, I ate them. But when I
went to see Harry Potter this weekend, I sat
there without cola, without candy, without even
movie popcorn. It was horrible, but it built
character to sit in that comfortable chair in
the dark while a gigantic screen relieved me of
the duty of any higher mental functions ? all
without the aid and comfort of candy. Really,
excepting the one M&Ms episode and the three
gallons of ice cream (which I really probably
should have lumped in with my empty-calorie
promise and given a miss), I have been quite
good. In non-candy related news, I spent the
weekend with
href="http://www.jonplummer.com/"
target=_blank>Jon and his
ever-more-beautiful wife, E~. It was raining the
day I flew out of Seattle, and when I finally
arrived in LA, the land famed for its buxom
tanned women strolling along sunny beaches, it
was raining even harder. But that was nothing to
the torrents that fell on Friday. I took
vacation days off work for this. It also rained
on Saturday. Sunday, the day I had to fly home,
I got up and it was beautiful and sunny and hot
and the clear blue sky stretched from horizon to
horizon. Of course. We put in a quick trip to
the Getty before taking me to the airport, so
that was okay. But mostly it was just very good
to get to see Jon and catch up.
My life is definitely impoverished by not having
more of him in it. Aside: Is it just me, or is
Saddam kicking our collective behinds? We are
the ones being all aggressive and irrational,
sure, but he is playing us like a yo-yo. Or like
a fish on a line. Or like some sort of special
fish-yo. He stands us off, then lets us come in,
then keeps us waiting, then lets us move forward
a step. He is good. He is better than us. The US
may be the bull, but Saddam is the clever
matador, dancing around and waving the red flag
that infuriates us, and eventually wearing us
down. We think we are the strongest player in
the arena, but we are not proving ourselves to
be anything like the cleverest, and so all our
strength comes to naught, and we are getting
played like a fish-yo accordion. Anyway. I am
off to bed. More catch-up news tomorrow.
You are missing the point...what Saddam does or
doesn't do, or whether we invade Iraq or not, or
whether there is another terrorist attack or
there isn't is not the point. All you have to do
is look to 1984 (the book) to realize that
Little Bush and his evil doers have what they
want - a state of perpetual war. It gives them
the pretext to erode our civil liberties and
ignore the real issues of the day. I mean, what
is the point of that terror level color coding
scheme they whipped up? It's to give them the
ability to scare the lowest common denominator.
"Who gives a shit about education, the
environment, or poverty...we're at fucking
orange!"
No, I cannot agree
with that. The rest of the world has lived with
the reality of the constant threat from
terrorists for decades, and it has not escalated
into a 'constant state of war'. It is something
of an inconvenience, like not being able to
throw away your trash in London because there
are no garbage cans on the streets, but it is
nothing like the realization of 1984.
Big Pussy, you are
perfectly illustrating ScottMcJ's point about
reactionary extremes in the face of uncertainty.
You are thinking and speaking in nth degrees
(evil doers, 1984) leaving no room for dialogue.
Blatent condemnation without a offering up an
alternate solution does nothing to help our
sense of foreboding and dred for our countries
future. And while I am not a Bush fan, laying
this all at his feet would be giving him far too
much credit...he's just then man in office when
America is getting the karmic bitch slap it
deserves from 60 years of meddling. And yes,
sigh, he does appear to enjoy his role a little
too much.
Email scottmcj hat scottmcj daht com : © scottmcj
And god bless Moveable Type and DreamHost
